Network Neutrality is the idea that all content on the internet is treated the same, and networks must pass on all information equally and all at the same speed. Networks are not allowed to block any type of content. Net. neutrality maintains the idea that all consumers have the right to view whatever they want. Networks are essentially neutral to the content they pass on. This idea creates a free and open market in the internet and does not allow the internet to be privatized by any companies.
The underlying issue of network neutrality is all about rights. Should all content really be treated equally? Do viewers really have the right to view whatever they want? and should network owners have the right to chose what content they carry? Also since more and more people are beginning to use the internet for purposes such as gaming and watching videos, internet quality is becoming more important. What about the demand for
quality of service? There are two different structures that try to answer these questions; telecommunication networks and information networks. Telecommunication networks are neutral to the content they pass, all data is treated equally, while information networks can chose the content they pass on.
Two groups in favor of net neutrality are companies like Google, yahoo and special interest groups such as liberals or the religious right. These groups believe that all information should be neutral and the only job networks should have is to move data. Proponents believe that net neutrality encourages economic innovation, democratic participation, and free speech online.
Two groups that oppose network neutrality are groups like AT&T and Sprint, who would like to control network content. These groups are interested in the idea of tiered service; you get what you pay for. Those who pay for better internet service would get faster and better access to sites. Opponents of net neutrality could slow down or even block access to certain sites that would somehow benefit them.
I believe that net neutrality is the right choice for the internet. By privatizing the internet, companies would have too much control. I believe that a free and open internet is does promote innovation, and everyone should recieve relitavely the same amount of service. the theory of tiered service would just leave the less fortunate behind and not do that much benefit for those who can afford it. Since net neutrality still has its regulations, it can still put a stop to websites displaying or promoting illegal content. Privatizing the internet through corporations like AT&T would be a bad idea for the concept of equal oppertunity that America has prided it self on for so long.